Étienne André
Public Health - Grenoble - France
Introduction
In the literature, poor treatment
compliance is noted across
many illnesses: half of the
patients either do not take the treatments that
are prescribed to them or they take the treatments
irregularly. With regard to education,
studies have long proven that simple information
reduces cholesterol level by 3%, for example,
while a more elaborate programme
decreases it by 6.5% (1). Diabetics who have
actively participated in education programmes
have experienced a 50% decrease in the appearance
or progression of retinopathy, renal insufficiency
and the number of amputations (14).
Studies indicate that medical costs are reduced
by half among educated asthmatic patients, with
a 75% prevention rate for asthmatic attacks and
an 80% decrease in emergency consultations
and hospitalizations.

Education for health
Health education takes its roots between 1978
(Alma-Ata), 1986 (Ottawa) and 1997 (Jakarta). Thus an inventory of the promotion of health
is prepared, allowing its determining factors to
be examined and its orientations to be defined
as well as the strategies to be adopted in order
to take up the challenges of the 21st century
concerning it.
Education for health proposes actions that aim
to maintain or to improve a state of health. It is
a process whereby individuals and/or groups work
together to improve their overall well-being,
become autonomous in their lives and healthcare,
and develop the ability to adapt in the face of risks
or challenges to their health (2). This process
emphasizes the opportunity for individuals to
work with their doctors and others to facilitate
behavior changes that are specifically directed
toward achieving predetermined goals for improving
their health (Nutbeam, W.H.O., 1986).
In practice, health education may be delivered
in many ways, but it is always implemented for
the following purposes:
To transmit information.
To allow for behavior modification, if the person
concerned desires it.
Patient education
and therapeutic
education
The appropriation
of a new life project
Patient Education and Therapeutic Education
share the same values and respect the
same principles as health education. They are
focused on the patients, and they combine with
the global management of the illness or
pathology to form one body within the context
of a multidisciplinary therapeutic
approach.
Patient Education occurs at all levels of prevention
and treatment. (see table 1).
Therapeutic Education concerns education
in relation to the implementation of the treatment,
for example, the proper usage of
aerosols for an asthmatic patient. Patient Education
takes into account the whole of his/her
lifestyle, behavior and environment.
Patient Education falls within the appropriation
of a new life project: “learn to live
with...” say F. Divernois and R. Gagnaire.
The concept of “empowerment” in the
Anglo-Saxon conception expresses the process
whereby the patient becomes “autonomous”
in his/her relationship with the disease, a
process that allows the patient to achieve better
control over his/her actions and of the decisions
that influence his/her health (3).
A different approach according
to the countries
The Netherlands has strongly integrated
patient education into its health system and its
care policy. This experience shows the limitations
of basic information compared to education that
includes help and psychosocial support.
Regular financing is in place in Italy, Germany
and Great Britain (4).
In the Scandinavian countries, education is
integrated into the basic care of chronic diseases.
In France, patient education remains marginal
in the course of the general or specialized
practitioner’s daily practice, or within pharmacies.
It is becoming increasingly structured
within a particularly active associative network,
which may or may not be close to care centers: School of the back, School of atopy, School of
respiration, etc.
Set the right objectives
The epidemiological transition has shifted
the priorities towards the chronic disabling and
social diseases. The search for quality and efficacy
is the consequence of the general conditions
created in the different countries guaranteeing
the rights of patients and security. Patient Education also plays an economic role
because it contributes, in principle, to reducing
complications and, therefore, medical and
hospitalization costs.
It is in this context that Patient Education
has developed. It favors the patient’s ability to
listen, his/her motivations and his/her projects:
the therapy project is constructed within these
parameters.
The objective of Patient Education is to
encourage the patient to become a player in
his/her health.
Numerous brakes exist: the requirement
of an adaptation of the care to the person,
the necessary cooperation between the different
players concerned. For Brigitte Sandrin-Berthon, "the aim is to understand what
he feels and the meaning which he gives to
his disease, and to his treatment. Starting
from there, one has more chances of being
understood."
An accepted ideal would be to believe that
the patient is only out for his own good and
can only be in agreement with the care giver.
The patient would be sensible and disciplined, “educable” and obedient. The reality is quite
different because the person is not necessarily
out for his own good (5-6).
The objective, therefore, is not to transform
the patient to his/her detriment, against
his/her will.
The modification of the care giver - care
receiver relationship
Traditionally, the patients are managed, in
the literal sense of the word, by the medical
body and care giver. However, the patient is
not always ready to be a stakeholder in his
treatment and does not claim his autonomy.
He has a need to rely on a doctor (7). Certain
cultures favor this form of recourse to the medical
authority or to the respect of those to
whom the knowledge is conferred.
Jean-Pierre Marcantoni, Jordi Carbonell |
The main principles
Two main stages condition the
adoption of a new behavior:
Stage 1:
the acquisition of information that justifies
the individual’s adoption of the behavior in
question, and an explanation of the modalities
of its adoption: the information is a central
element in the confidence relationship
between the therapist and the patient, and
contributes to the patient’s active participation
in his/her care (8);
Stage 2:
a time of reflection, called appropriation or
integration, during which the patient compares
the accepted information to his personal history,
his motivations, his environment…
At the end of this second stage, the patient
may do one of the following:
Reformulate a new series of questions.
Decide to adopt or not to adopt the behavior
in question.
This involves a succession of information-appropriation, information-appropriation, …
stages until decision making.
Therapeutic education in 4 stages
L’ANAES (Agence Nationale d’Accréditation
et d’Evaluation en Santé [National Agency of
Accreditation and of Evaluation in Health]) (8) proposes a strategy in 4 stages (see table 2): a
diagnosis for a therapeutic education that is
adapted to each patient, the acqu isition of
competences by the patient, programmed educational
activities and an evaluation.
The definition of the World Health
Organisation
The position of the World Health Organisation
(WHO) is that patients should be trained like
professionals. WHO has underlined four important
points on the therapeutic education of
patients (9).
To train the patient so that he can acquire
adequate know-how in order for him to reach
a balance between his life and the optimal control
of the disease.
The therapeutic education of the patient is
a continuous process that is an integral part of
the medical care.
The therapeutic education of the patient
comprises awareness, information, apprenticeship,
and psychosocial support, all linked to the
disease and to the treatment
The training must allow the patient and his
family to collaborate better with the care givers.
Content of the competences
to be acquired
The professionals must acquire the following
competences: capacity of organization,
methodological knowledge, relational and
educational capacity and, of course, knowledge
of the pathology and of its treatment. The associations are also concerned because
they all suffer from a lack of training in all the
fields quoted above.
The patients must acquire capacities of
analysis and self-surveillance, decision-making
autonomy and capacities of adaptation. Finally, patients must have good knowledge
of the health care system and its resources.
The brakes
on Patient Education
There are numerous reasons why health
care professionals do not incorporate patient
education into their care:
A lack of motivation, a fear of change, a lack
of time, and insufficient training among the
professionals.
A feeling of loss of their power, of their
authority and, therefore, a fear of failure: doctors
do not have the failure culture.
Incapacity to work in a network and an
absence of recognition in a job shared with others.
The reticence of the patient, often more a
pretext than reality.
The low involvement of the families and, in
particular, their difficulty in communicating in
certain diseases. Example: HIV.
A lack of means; in particular, financial.
The social and environmental situation of
the patient. For example, after ten years of
action in the fight against growing obesity in
a disadvantaged environment, without convincing
results, Dr JL Grenier, diabetologist and
nutritionist at Roubaix - F, reorients the objectives
of nutritional education toward the problem
of precariousness (10).
When the participants are studied in the
framework of Patient Education programmes,
the modest level of involvement of certain professions
in the competences that are indispensable
for the patients’ autonomy is noted: dieticians,
physiotherapists, occupational therapists,
among others.
The fields concerned
by Patient Education
Acceptance of the disease
In the case of a chronic disease, acceptance
is difficult. When patients are asked to choose
between the two formulations: "I have
fibromyalgia" or "I am fibromyalgic", they prefer
the first, where the relation to the disease
is not ontological.
Compliance with the treatment
In France, for an average level of compliance
of 50 to 60% in the “unsorted” patients,
it is clearly less than asthma, since currently "more than 80% of patients who are suffering
from it do not follow their therapies sufficiently
in order to obtain optimal benefits".
Knowledge of the disease
Good usage of the treatment
Aerosols in asthmatics, anticoagulants, antihypertensive
drugs, insulin, for example.
Acceptance of hospitalization
The implementation of specific
behaviors in certain diseases
Let us loosely cite a few behaviors capable of
being the subject of a Patient Education action:
Nutritional modification in the obese or in
patients suffering from sleep apnea syndrome,
Smoking cessation in… Everybody!
Re-adaptation to physical effort post-infarct,
Biological self-surveillance in the diabetic,
Maintenance of physical activity in a
fibromyalgia patient, etc.
Compliance and hygiene in case of allergies,
Maintenance of an activity in handicapped
patients,
Abstinence in alcoholic patients in a restricting
social environment, …
Diabetes is, by far, the disease that has given
rise to the most Patient Education centers.
Chris Henriksson, Piercarlo Sarzi Puttini, Jaime Branco, Dan Buskila, Olivier Vitton |
The players of Patient
Education
Practical solutions
"The schools"
School of the back, School of atopy, School of respiration, Schools of asthma (see charter
in annex 2), Multidisciplinary Centre in Patient
Education, Centre of prevention of atherosclerosis
and Anglo-Saxon "Heart Failure Clinics,"
as much as structures that bring practical
responses to the patients and a framework of
work to the professionals.
The institutional frameworks of
interventions are very dissimilar:
volunteer associations and structures are
numerous, often leaders in the southern European
countries: more than 500 in France
private clinic
hospital or public care centre
Fabien Pillard, Daniel Rivière,
Florence Gaudoux, François Brackman,
Viviana Tavares |
The isolated health professional
Patient education is problematic for the
individual doctor, or pharmacist, for example,
because patient education can only be
conceived within the framework of a concerted
effort that is programmed in a more
or less formalized network, which gives
coherence to multidisciplinary management.
The role of the media and of
Internet sites
As with everything, the best and the worst
information is found here. With regard to content,
the patients discover, exchange and break
their isolation. With regard to format, the
information does not present any scientific or
educational guarantee.
These supports, however, represent powerful,
useful tools because they contribute to
the following:
Increased awareness of the population in a
given subject: One of the best, French-speaking
examples was the National campaign on
the moderation of alcohol consumption: "One
glass, fine, three glasses… sparks will fly."
Information on behaviors with risks or on
preventative behaviors: European campaign
on 5 fruits or vegetables per day.
Establishing a dialogue between patients:
Forum on HIV positive patients.
Proposing concrete responses: Education of
diabetics…
In rheumatology
Patient education programmes exist in
rheumatology: close to 50% in the local hospitals,
30% in referring hospitals and rarely in
long-term care establishments.
In a French study on the training of
rheumatology teams in patient education, the
results show that the whole team is trained in
1.3% of the programmes described in this
inquiry, part of the team is trained in 29.3%
of the cases, a single person is trained in 14.7%
of the cases, and no team members are specifically
trained in 48% of the programmes that
take place.
The case of fibromyalgia
Maintenance of physical activity or of exercise,
cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), self-management
and medicines have been proposed. It appears that it is very much the combination
of several approaches, including physical activity,
information and CBT, that is the most promising
good management of Fibromyalgia
patients (11-12-13). Again, it is necessary that
these patients find a trained team ready to
greet them.
Conclusion
Therapeutic education is a profound change
because the patient is no longer the object but
becomes the subject of the care that is delivered
to him.
Reference List |
|
1 Impact Physician
Hebdo n° 287, 30 June
1995
2 DIREPS Secteur Nordouest – Comité Français
d’Education pour la
Santé [North-West
Sector – French
Committee of Education
for Health], 1987
3 Nutbeam D. Glossaire
Promotion de la santé
[Promotion of health
Glossary], Gamburg,
Editions Promotion de la
santé, 1998
4 DECCACHE A.
L’éducation du patient
en Europe: plus de vingt
ans d’évolution
constante [Patient
education in Europe:
more than twenty years
of constant evolution].
Bulletin d’Education du
Patient, 2000, vol.19,
n°1, pp. 2-7
5 LECORPS P. Penser le
patient comme "sujet"
éducable ? [Does the
patient think like an
educatable "Subject"?]
in revue Education du
patient, 2004
6 LECORPS P. Penser le
sujet pour mieux penser
la santé [Think the
subject to think health better], In l’Etat de la
France, 1999 – 2000
7 GAGNAYRE R,
D’IVERNOIS J-F. Raisons
et difficultés
pédagogiques pour une
reconnaissance de l’acte éducatif en tant qu’acte
thérapeutique in La
Santé de l’homme
[Reasons and
educational difficulties
for recognition of the
educational act as being
a therapeutic act],
n°341, May-June 1999,
p.11
8 ANAES France, March
2000
9 OMS - WHO
Therapeutic patient
education. Continuing
education programmes
for health care providers
in the field of
prevention of chronic
diseases. October 1998
10 GRENIER JL Revue la
santé de l’homme, de
l’alimentation à la santé
[from food to health],
n°358
11 ADAMS N., SIM J.
Rehabilitation
approaches in
fibromyalgia. Disability
and rehabilitation, 17
Jun 2005, vol. 27, no.12, p. 711-2
12 RAMOS-REMUS C,
SALCEDO-ROCHA A.L. et
al How important is
patient education? Best
Practice and Research in
Clinical Rheumatology,
2000, vol. 14, no. 4, p.
689-703
13 HENRIKSSON C.,
CARLBERG U.,
KJAELLMAN M.,
LUNDBERG G.,
HENRIKSSON KG.
Evaluation of four
outpatient educational
programmes for patients
with longstanding
fibromyalgia. Journal of
rehabilitation medicine,
Sept 2004, vol. 36, no. 5,
p. 211-9
14 Works LACROIX A.,
ASSAL J.P. L’Education
thérapeutique des
patients, « Nouvelles
approches de la maladie
chronique » [The
therapeutic education of
patients, "Novel
approaches to chronic
disease"], Editions
Vigot, Paris, 1998.
|
|